INFLUENZA VACCINE AWARENESS AND ACCEPTANCE AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH GLOMERULONEPHRITIS AND RENAL VASCULITIS DURING THE CORONONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 PANDEMIC

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with glomerulonephritis may have an increased risk of influenza infection and morbidity, but vaccine coverage remained low with little data on acceptance in glomerulonephritis. We aimed to assess influenza vaccine awareness among patients with glomerulonephritis and identify determinants of vaccine acceptance. METHOD: Single-center cross-sectional study of patients with glomerulonephritis who completed a survey in the clinic or over the telephone between June and August 2021. Sociodemographic data, health literacy measured by HLS-EU-47 questionnaire, influenza and the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine awareness and determinants of vaccine acceptance according to the World Health Organization framework. RESULTS: Among 86 patients who completed the survey, influenza vaccine awareness was lower than COVID-19 vaccine awareness (75.6% versus 100%). After adjusting for the survey type, use of English language at home and at healthcare settings, higher income and professional or executive occupation were significantly associated with influenza vaccine awareness, while older age and lower education level were associated with reduced awareness. The healthcare provider was the most frequent information source and > 90% trusted that healthcare providers and the government considered the patients' best interests and gave correct information. Only half thought their medical condition and medications would affect their vaccine decision while a quarter to half did not understand how the vaccine worked and thought there were better ways to protect against infection. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers can actively identify and advocate influenza vaccines to the unaware and overcome potential barriers to reduce influenza infections and morbidity in glomerulonephritis.

Understanding the dynamics of COVID-19; implications for therapeutic intervention, vaccine development and movement control.

The COVID-19 disease is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is highly infective within the human population. The virus is widely disseminated to almost every continent with over twenty-seven million infections and over ninety-thousand reported deaths attributed to COVID-19 disease. SARS-CoV-2 is a single stranded RNA virus, comprising three main viral proteins; membrane, spike and envelope. The clinical features of COVID-19 disease can be classified according to different degrees of severity, with some patients progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome, which can be fatal. In addition, many infections are asymptomatic or only cause mild symptoms. As there is no specific treatment for COVID-19 there is considerable endeavour to raise a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, in addition to engineering neutralizing antibody interventions. In the absence of an effective vaccine, movement controls of varying stringencies have been imposed. Whilst enforced lockdown measures have been effective, they may be less effective against the current strain of SARS-CoV-2, the G614 clade. Conversely, other mutations of the virus, such as the Δ382 variant could reduce the clinical relevance of infection. The front runners in the race to develop an effective vaccine focus on the SARS-Co-V-2 Spike protein. However, vaccines that produce a T-cell response to a wider range of SARS-Co-V-2 viral proteins, may be more effective. Population based studies that determine the level of innate immunity to SARS-CoV-2, from prior exposure to the virus or to other coronaviruses, will have important implications for government imposed movement control and the strategic delivery of vaccination programmes.

[An epidemiologic thinking on the diagnosis criteria of COVID-19].

The diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on the positive of etiological test. The current etiological test of COVID-19 cost long time, and have high false negative rate, may resulting delay the measures of disease treatment and prevention. We suggested that COVID-19 should be diagnosed as 3 types: suspected case, clinical diagnosed case, and definite diagnosed case.